US Senate Overturns SEC Crypto Rule for Banks

A significant number of lawmakers in the United States Senate have approved a joint resolution urging the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to rescind a specific rule impacting financial institutions that engage with cryptocurrency firms. On May 16, a decisive 60 to 38 vote saw U.S. Senators endorse H.J.Res. 109, a resolution aimed at overturning the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121. This particular rule mandates that banks list customers’ digital assets on their balance sheets and hold capital against them, a stance that many lawmakers and industry leaders argue hampers technological advancement and business growth.

The 60 ‘Yeas’ in the Senate vote is a remarkable outcome, sending an emphatic message across party lines in both houses of Congress that there is considerable disapproval of the SEC’s rule. The crypto advocacy group Blockchain Association highlighted this sentiment in a social media post on May 16, emphasizing the bipartisan disapproval evident from the vote.

Prior to this Senate vote, the resolution had already made it through the U.S. House of Representatives. President Joe Biden had articulated his intention to veto the bill on May 8. The President’s reasoning was to protect investors in cryptocurrency markets and safeguard the broader financial system from potential risks associated with digital assets.

Should the President decide to veto the legislation, it will be sent back to Congress. For the resolution to pass again and override the veto, it will need the support of a two-thirds majority in both the Senate and the House of Representatives. Achieving such a majority can often be a formidable challenge, underscoring the political complexity surrounding this legislative effort.

The threat of a presidential veto, Does not negate the rising sentiment among the electorate, particularly younger voters, that elected officials should pay attention to cryptocurrency issues. This point was stressed by the Blockchain Association, which noted the growing awareness and interest in cryptocurrency among the public.

This tension between regulatory measures and innovation in the crypto space reflects a broader debate about how best to balance oversight and technological progress. Many advocates argue that excessive regulation could drive innovation out of the United States, stifling the growth of a burgeoning industry with significant economic potential.

Supporters of the resolution contend that the existing SEC rule places undue burdens on financial institutions, discouraging them from engaging with cryptocurrency firms. They believe that removing this obstacle could foster a more conducive environment for financial innovation and support the development of blockchain technology.

As the situation unfolds, it remains to be seen how Congress and the President will navigate this legislative conflict. The resolution has cast a spotlight on the broader issues of financial innovation, regulatory oversight, and the future of cryptocurrency in the United States, setting the stage for ongoing debates and potential policy shifts in the near future.

Hanan Escamilla

Hanan Escamilla

10 thoughts on “US Senate Overturns SEC Crypto Rule for Banks

  1. A huge missed opportunity to embrace financial innovation. Its like they want to drive all tech advancement out of the country. Disappointing.

  2. This could mean great things for job creation and technological innovation in the US!

  3. I’m tired of these antiquated stances on cryptocurrency. Financial institutions need freedom to innovate, not more roadblocks.

  4. This is a huge step towards fostering a more favorable environment for crypto!

  5. This is just another instance of fear and misunderstanding halting progress. The SEC rule was flawed from the start. Fix this mess! 😠

  6. The Senate’s decision is a positive sign for technological progress!

  7. Hope this paves the way for more balanced and forward-thinking regulations!

  8. How much longer do we have to deal with these outdated views on cryptocurrency? The SEC rule is doing more harm than good.

Leave a Reply