CBDCs: Privacy vs Future Currency

Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) have become a topic of debate as they offer both benefits and drawbacks. CBDCs are centralized and backed by a country’s central bank, while cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are decentralized and not controlled by any authority. Supporters of CBDCs argue that they can improve payment efficiency and financial inclusion for those with limited access to the financial system. Critics, Worry about privacy infringement and government corruption. Kadan Stadelmann, CTO of Komodo, shares these concerns and believes that Bitcoin is a better alternative to CBDCs as it is decentralized and cannot be controlled or shut down by anyone.

El Salvador made Bitcoin legal tender in September 2021, becoming the first country to do so. The Central African Republic followed suit in 2022. In contrast, only 16 out of 193 governments worldwide have deployed a working CBDC to the public, according to the Human Rights Foundation. Stadelmann argues that it is important to think critically about the potential abuses and limitations of CBDCs. He also believes that living in fear will not bring about a more peaceful financial system and that innovation is necessary.

Peter Alfred-Adekeye, CEO of Boom Market, sees CBDC adoption as a seal of approval for crypto technology and a win for the environment. He points out that CBDCs can be exploited by corrupt individuals in power and pose a risk to privacy and freedom. He suggests a two-state solution where CBDCs coexist with decentralized tokenized fiat and other assets to provide a balanced approach.

Sebastien Davies, VP of Research at Aquanow, believes that opposition to CBDCs stems from concerns about centralization and potential government control. He suggests that strong privacy protections and limits on government control could alleviate some fears. Davies also emphasizes the need for comprehensive regulatory frameworks to safeguard privacy and prevent excessive surveillance.

Lucas Kiely, CIO of Yield App, explains that both the crypto community and traditional finance industry have concerns about CBDCs. Crypto enthusiasts fear the erosion of privacy and personal freedoms, while traditional finance professionals worry about disruption to existing financial systems and economic instability. Kiely argues for finding a middle ground between the two camps and suggests that CBDCs could be a gateway to the wider adoption of cryptocurrencies.

The debate around CBDCs continues, with a mix of support and resistance. Many questions remain unanswered about their implementation and impact. It is challenging to assess their potential positive or negative impact until more clarity is provided.

Miran Umstead

Miran Umstead

Leave a Reply